Letter: Reconsidering executions for cowardice in the First World War
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I always believed that failure to understand the effects of shell-shock led to many unfair executions for cowardice in the 1914-18 war. But now the Prime Minister assures us that these effects were recognised then.
Yet it is John Major's government that today refuses to acknowledge the effects of sustained domestic brutality on women driven to kill their spouses.
Each time proposals are put forward to change the law on provocation, or mandatory life sentences, to take the effects of this violence more fully into account, ministers shake their heads. They fear '. . . the effects any change would have on public confidence'.
There is more than one kind of cowardice.
Yours faithfully,
JACK ASHLEY
House of Lords,
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments