Letter: Reasons to clone a mobile phone

Dr Michael H. Smith
Saturday 25 November 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Dr Michael H. Smith

Sir: With regard to your article "Mobile-phone industry acts against 'clones' ", (22 November), mobile phone cloning or re-chipping is not confined to fraudulent activity but has several legitimate purposes which you do not mention. For example, someone wishing to upgrade their equipment may wish to transfer their existing number to avoid suffering the inconvenience of publicising a new number. Conversely, in a competitive environment, mobile phone users should be free to transfer to a new service provider without having to purchase new equipment. There may also be legitimate reasons for having two telephones sharing the same number (perhaps a car phone and a hand-portable) where the use on either unit would be insufficient to justify two separate lines, or two separate numbers would be inconvenient. Imagine the outcry if BT insisted that every internal extension within a home had to pay separate line charges. None of these uses involves fraud.

The root of the problem is that equipment costs are generally subsidised by the excessive usage charges levied by the service providers - how else could expensive mobile phones be made available at such low prices?

Yours faithfully,

Michael H. Smith

Bury, Lancashire

23 November

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in