Letter: Put donations to the ballot
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.sIR: Political donations by public companies are most likely to be made by a company under the effective control of an entrepreneur of strong personality and/or with a large shareholding. In contrast, where the chairman is not more than the first among equals, and directors' shareholdings are modest, as is the case with a number of leading companies, political donations are not the norm.
There can be be no objection in principle to large shareholdings of directors conferring voting power proportionate to the size of stake, when such power is exercised as a stabilising influence in the pursuit of a company's commercial objectives. But do large shareholdings provide an adequate validation for decision-taking by directors over political donations?
These may depend more on personal political sympathies than on any perceived commercial benefit to the company.
An interesting initiative to ascertain the viewpoints of its large number of individual shareholders was carried out by a highly regarded multinational, Unilever, on a 'one shareholder, one vote' basis. The outcome was a slim majority in favour of political donations by the company, but as the result was finely balanced, the board decided not to go ahead.
The steps taken by Unilever, perhaps carried out periodically, could provide the basis for reform to resolve this contentious issue of political donations by public companies.
Yours truly,
S. G. GRANT
Letchworth, Hertfordshire
18 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments