Letter: Manifesto for recovery: Gatt, housing market, monetary policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I write to applaud the Independent's manifesto for national recovery and to commend its principal economic measures to the Government. However, I believe that two important issues are inadequately addressed.
The first concerns profitable, but cash-strapped, companies with excessive debt on their balance sheets. In a majority of cases, their access to replacement capital market finance (equity issues, in particular) has been shut off at precisely the moment that it is most needed. As a result, many firms have been forced to take hasty cost-cutting measures in order to conserve liquidity. These often have devastating economic effects.
The paucity of equity issues this year is directly attributable to the Government's misguided funding policy. Its voracious appetite for funds has killed the sterling market for risk capital. The policy of fully funding the Government's budget deficit should be overturned in the Chancellor's Mansion House speech on Thursday.
Second, as it stands, the package of measures could have dire and unintended consequences on the building societies and all their existing borrowers. The violent twist in the yield curve will encourage huge quantities of building society deposits to migrate towards government securities. Saddled with their large portfolio of non-performing loans, the societies would be forced to withhold the benefits of lower interest rates for themselves (or face ruin). As in America, the small private-sector borrower may be left paying the price for others' folly.
I fear that the revival of the housing market will ultimately require that the Government assumes responsibility for some of the existing stock of mortgage debt. This is the only way that building societies can cope with the implied loss of deposits and yet still afford to pass on the reduction in interest rates.
Yours faithfully,
PETER WARBURTON
Dunstable, Bedfordshire
23 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments