Letter: Legalisation of cannabis: freedom of personal choice or exposure to risk?

Mr Peter Stoker
Saturday 05 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In some 500 column inches of drug news (2 and 3 March), the most astonishing assertion is that the 'legalisation debate' has not received widespread publicity. What was your reporter on? Newspapers, radio and TV have sustained a strident and partial pro-drug coverage for months, which sadly your Thursday leading article reflects.

Had this bias been removed or reversed, and backed up with the full facts on cannabis (such as brain damage, psychoses, faster lung cancer than tobacco, immune system damage, birth defects - vide more than 10,000 studies worldwide), you would have found even less than one in three supporting 'limited legalisation'.

'Legalisation beats crime' is as daft as it sounds. Wherever it has been tried (for example, Alaska and Holland's flirtation with decriminalisation), crime has worsened, and use of all drugs has escalated. What has been found to work is a combination of firm laws and quality community-based prevention, of which education is a key part. There is plenty of evidence that good drug prevention works.

Yours faithfully,

PETER STOKER

Consultant

Positive Prevention Plus

Slough, Berkshire

3 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in