Letter: Insights from the social sciences are needed to protect the environment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: On Monday, 7 February, the ninth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change will meet in Geneva to discuss, for the first time, the adequacy of commitments of the Climate Convention. Climate Action Network UK (Can UK) members are concerned that the present target to return greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000 fails to reflect the goal of the Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Members of Can UK, a network of leading environmental groups working on climate change, are therefore disappointed by the lost opportunities in the Government's document, Climate Change: the UK Programme, which was published on 25 January.
While encouraged by the Department of the Environment's analysis of the problem, and the few specific measures included, we believe that the overall framework for actions proposed to address it are inadequate to combat the threat of climate change. The need for a higher existing target and a target for CO2 emissions beyond the year 2000 were identified as vital components of the national CO2 programme by the participants in the DoE's consultation process on the programme last year, and yet both remain unaltered.
We are therefore still concerned by the following: the unambitious target for CO2 and other greenhouse gases such as methane; the lack of targets beyond the year 2000; and the paucity of specific measures, particularly in the transport sector.
Can UK urges the British government to commit itself to reduce its emissions of CO2 by at least 20 per cent, from the base year established by the convention by the year 2005, at a level consistent with the Toronto conference target. These are the minimum actions consistent with the precautionary principle and with sustainable development that Britain should affirm and demonstrate its willingness to adopt.
Yours sincerely,
SALLY CAVANAGH
Co-ordinator, Climate Action
Network UK
ANDREW WARREN
Director, Association for the Conservation of Energy
TONY BURTON
Senior Planner, Council for the Protection of Rural England
JULIE HILL
Director, Green Alliance
TIM BROWN
Public Relations Officer, National Society for Clean Air and Environmental Protection
TIM SANDS
Director of Conservation, Royal Society for Nature Conservation
BARNABY BRIGGS
Energy & Transport Policy Officer, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
LYNN SLOMAN
Deputy Director, Transport 2000
GILL WITTER
Pollution Policy Officer, World Wide Fund for Nature
London, WC2
4 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments