Letter: Green ideas are alive and well but living under assumed names
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GEOFFREY LEAN is quite right: 'It's Not Easy Being Green' (27 February). Especially with journalists like him around. They turn up at every Green Party conference and, for some reason, are willing to write only one story: the Green Party is dead. Jonathon Porritt and Sara Parkin are old news. They left because the Green Party is determinedly democratic and would not set up icons. David Icke is not much in favour either.
The Greens' real problem is that we cannot get our message out. We find that the press is willing to pick our brains but unwilling to give our ideas an airing. It was with bitter laughter that we saw the Green/Plaid Cymru Energy Conservation Bill ascribed to the Liberal Democrats.
We are consistently 10 years ahead of every other party in our thinking. Look at the following ideas, just on the brink of becoming politically mainstream. They have long been Green Party policies:
the promotion of public transport instead of motorways;
conversion of the arms industry to civilian production;
a social wage instead of DSS allowances; this should also be paid to farmers instead of environmentally disastrous production subsidies;
the strengthening of regional government as opposed to the centralising tendencies of Whitehall and Brussels.
Geoffrey Lean says we are not in favour of economic growth. We are certainly not in favour of supposedly 'sustainable' economic growth that pulls in increasing quantities of natural resources and creates greater levels of pollution in the satisfaction of artificially created demand. We are not in favour of an economic growth that is the very source and
engine of global environmental decline.
We are in favour of a massive growth in the environmental industry, dedicated to the healing, preservation and proper stewardship of the
global environment.
Paul Edwards
Prospective Green Party
candidate
Devon and East Plymouth
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments