Letter: Free information
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Stephen Dorril (letter, 17 December) suggests the Campaign for Freedom of Information has been naive for allegedly suggesting that a Freedom of Information (FOI) Act would have prevented the arms for Iraq scandal - something we have not in fact claimed. But a decent Act should have provided access to documents indicating the crucial change in policy on arms sales to Iraq. Scott reported that the "overriding" reason for concealing the change was "a fear of strong public opposition" to greater defence sales to Iraq. These are not valid grounds for withholding information under an FOI Act.
Nor do I believe we have been naive in welcoming the Government's freedom of information proposals. They will not cover the security services or the non-administrative functions of the police - significant omissions, which should be challenged. However, Mr Dorril is mistaken in suggesting that defence and foreign affairs are also to be excluded.
The range of bodies covered by the Act - which includes local government, hundreds of quangos and even the privatised utilities - is greater than under any other country's FOI law. The right of access will extend to old files awaiting release in the Public Record Office. The proposed commissioner will have the power of a court to compel government to release information: a citizen-friendly, effective enforcement mechanism. Many of the proposed exemptions will permit information to be withheld only if disclosure would cause "substantial damage", a tougher test than the plain "damage" required under the American act.
Of course there may be pressure to weaken the legislation, by charges or other means. But these are bolder proposals than we, and I suspect most others, expected to see, and promise significant improvements to the individual's rights and the accountability of the state.
Maurice Frankel
Director
The Campaign for Freedom of Information
London EC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments