Letter: Facts that the press can report

Mr Richard Stott
Friday 06 October 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Richard Stott

Sir: First rule of journalism. Check your quotes. I was misquoted by Henry Porter in the Independent today ("When they publish, damn them," 6 October).

This was taken from a quote in the Times, which has now acknowledged its error:

If he is seriously saying that nobody can report a crime in case somebody is later charged with committing it, it is nonsense. What happens if there is a big bomb and someone is arrested running away from the scene of the crime - does that mean that we cannot now say that 15 people died in the explosion?

Of course, I wouldn't say anything as fatuous as the words the Independent attributes to me. If Mr Porter had read Today, he would have found the correct version of what I said, which was:

This is a hysterical judgment. It is immensely patronising to suggest that jurors cannot tell the difference between newspaper reports and evidence in a court of law.

If the judge's view of what constitutes contempt was taken to its logical conclusion, it would mean that if there was a bomb explosion and someone was immediately arrested and charged, we could not report it.

Yours faithfully,

Richard Stott

Editor

Today

London, E1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in