Letter: ECT: benefits vs side-effects; patients' testimony

Dr Simon Green
Thursday 17 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The debate in your columns on electroconvulsive therapy suffers from simplifications on both sides. ECT is effective for some patients, although benefit may not persist without further treatments (British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 160, p355). It does work through changes in brain chemistry, but comparing this favourably with the current generation of pharmacologically specific drugs would be similar to the assumption that a broken television could be mended as readily with a sledgehammer as with a screwdriver: you might jog the right bit.

Yes, some patients will suffer significant memory loss; on the other hand, some will not. The only justification is pragmatic, as those patients who respond tend to have the most recalcitrant forms of depression, and many of these are grateful for its use.

As it is impossible to predict who will benefit, many patients will receive the treatment unnecessarily, especially those with conditions other than depression. How do you weigh benefit for the minority against the side effects and distress caused by this procedure? There is no simple answer.

Yours sincerely,

SIMON GREEN

Senior Lecturer in Psychology

Department of Psychology

Birkbeck College

University of London

London, WC1

15 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in