Letter: East Jerusalem for the Arabs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Connor Cruise O'Brien mocks Jerusalem's pious Muslims for 'staying home and leaving (Teddy Kollek) to the electoral mercy of Allah' (Comment, 12 November). It should, however, be pointed out that:
1. East Jerusalem is, according to international consensus, an Arab city. The Palestinians' boycotting elections that would bring a foreigner to its mayorship is a matter of principle.
2. According to international law and Security Council resolutions, Israeli settlers are the equivalent of an occupying militia. Palestinians have every right to attack them and their army every which way they can. This is called resistance, which is how it was labelled, for example, when the French fought German occupation.
Mr O'Brien argues that the Gaza-Jericho plan is 'more likely to collapse at the Israeli than at the PLO end . . . (because) Israel is a democracy'. Subsequently, he asserts that
If . . . the Arafat administration takes on its own extremists, and succeeds in crushing them, the agreement will become a working partnership and in that event, the idea of a Palestinian state, at peace with Israel, becomes a real possibility.
Mr O'Brien does not say that the Arafat administration should be a democratic one tolerating all Palestinian factions and allowing them the right to elect their leadership. His arguments insinuate that if the Palestinians want their state, their administration must be a ruthless dictatorship. Talk about hypocrisy and double standards.
Yours faithfully,
SALAH EZZ
Oxford
15 November
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments