Letter: Double-checks on bills for wills
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In your coverage of the recent Which? survey of wills ('Wills drafted by solicitors and banks attacked', 6 October), you report the magazine as saying that controls on banks and solicitors acting as executors are needed urgently. While there are no external controls on the way a bank charges for an executorship, it is not true to say that there are no controls on solicitors.
In addition to the existing controls on solicitors, there will shortly be additional protection for the public. From 1 November, beneficiaries under a will where a solicitor is executor will be able to ask the Law Society for an independent check on the bill if there is a difference of view over the fairness of the solicitor's charges.
When making their will, therefore, members of the public can confidently appoint solicitors as executors.
Yours faithfully,
ANDREW LOCKLEY
Director, Legal Practice
The Law Society
London, WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments