Letter: Critical perspective of Italy's left

Mr David M. Fisher
Thursday 09 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'Better old reds than neo-Fascists' (7 December) should be complimented for avoiding the misleading stereotype implied in its headline. As you rightly observe, the Italian Democratic Party of the Left (PDS) is a different creature from the country's former Communist Party (PCI). What a pity then that your reporters and sub-editors continue to refer to it by the epithets 'former Communist' or 'ex-Communist'.

Perhaps these labels explain your continuing inability to grasp both the immediate content and the deeper portent of the changes set in train by the formation of the PDS. Describing the latter as a 'social democratic-style party' may help British readers appreciate the fact of its mutation but does not accurately describe the nature of it. The real change is considerably more radical.

The omission of terms such as 'social', 'socialist', 'labour' or 'workers' from the new party's name was not a matter of tactical convenience, but was based upon a new perspective on politics. This hypothesised that the end of the Cold War, and of nation-state sovereignty, had consigned the entire socialist tradition to history.

The denomination 'Democratic Party of the Left' derives from the fact that the party's role is now perceived in terms of the functional requirements of an effective democratic system, and not in terms of a strategy for transition from a capitalist social order to a socialist one. In other words, the left (including those forces that derive from historic socialism) is now attributed a critical function within democracy: that of keeping democracy healthy by offering alternative government based on an expansion of its application to previously marginalised sections of society.

This explains why the PDS has been the force behind institutional reform in Italy, and why it has been able to build broad-based alliances for government, while the 'new' forces on the right have been content to ride the tide of anti-centrist protest. The success of this strategy, and the fact that Italy is already well down the road to a post-Cold War political system should make it the subject of greater attention from reformers in Britain. Not only would aspirant ministers in the Labour and Liberal Democratic parties do well to heed the tactical benefits of such a strategy, but Democratic Conservatives might consider the fate of an Italian ruling elite that once sought to deprive its opposition of any legitimate role in the government of society.

Yours faithfully,

DAVID M. FISHER

Department of Politics

University of Bristol

Bristol

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in