Letter: Community values
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In arguing that Britons are averse to community life, Andrew Marr writes (9 February) that 'in all affluent societies greater wealth has been used to buy less community and more privacy'. This gives a quite misleading picture of human nature as essentially reclusive and unsocial.
His observation is only true in relation to societies marked by pockets of wealth and security in a general setting of impoverishment and hostility. Inland Revenue Statistics shows that the wealthiest 1 per cent of the population owns three times more marketable wealth than that owned by the bottom 50 per cent. Some areas suffer high rates of crime, ill-health and despair while others enjoy security and comfort. What reasonable person would not be wary of 'the community' in many parts of Britain today?
Yours faithfully,
GARY SLAPPER
Law School
Staffordshire University
Stoke-on-Trent
9 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments