Letter: Children suffer under persecution of travelling families
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article ('A law that threatens to tie down the nomads', 17 February), although well-intentioned, fails to address certain key issues. First of all, it propagates the myth that all nomadic people in this country are gypsies, whereas in fact only a tiny proportion are true Romany gypsies.
The great majority are scrap metal merchants, Irish tinkers and 'tarmaccers', New Age travellers and various others of dubious extraction. This mixed bunch hardly 'pursue a lifestyle rich in culture', and to refer to them as gypsies is an insult to those who are. Real gypsies, virtually always recognisable by their dark complexions, would never behave like most of the itinerants do, for example, leaving rubbish around and, in general, causing havoc wherever they go.
Second, the law has obviously not been 'fairly even-handed' in its treatment of travelling people, gypsies or otherwise. If that were the case, why haven't local authorities that have blatantly ignored the Caravan Sites Act, now 25 years old, been prosecuted? If enough sites had been provided, today's problems would have largely been avoided.
Far from being 'alarmist', claims of ethnic cleansing are borne out historically and with the latest proposed legislation, which, if passed, will only make matters far worse.
Yours sincerely,
IAN CRUICKSHANK
Reading, Berkshire
17 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments