Letter: Change is key to motor car gridlock
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The excellent paper by Friends of the Earth and Christian Wolmar (report, 19 August), and John Prescott's invitation to contribute to ideas for developing an integrated transport policy (report, 22 August), are welcome and long overdue.
The reaction of the motoring organisations is generally cautiously welcoming but the screams of anguish from three-car families (mother from Guildford - ``I love my Mercedes'' - report, 22 August) and the Association of British Drivers (Letters, 22 August) - ``to be able to travel at will is a vital freedom'' are sad.
Do not pedestrians, cyclists and those who do not own cars have equal rights to highway space and to reliable, safe and cost-effective public transport?
The fact that there is not enough road space for everyone and that the message is loud and clear from the Government: ``We are not against you owning cars, but we must consider constraining use, particularly where there is congestion, to enable better use of the road space for everyone, and so that buses and other priority users may have some chance of providing a reliable service.''
Of course there are essential car users, but how many of the drivers entering and leaving cities in the rush hour or belting around the M25 really need their cars for "work" on a particular day? Are they not just making use of that valuable perk, the free office car park?
Perhaps they should try public transport, lobby for its improvement and, if necessary, plan to alter their lifestyle before they are forced to do so by gridlock.
BERKELEY
House of Lords
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments