Letter: Cameras a threat to civil liberties
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Stewart Hennessey is correct in his observation on closed-circuit television systems that 'arguments over civil liberties seem to have collapsed in the face of fear of crime'; and rightly so. Evidence shows that crime has dropped dramatically in town and city centres throughout Britain where such systems have been installed since the Safer Cities Project was launched in 1988.
But it was interesting that Mr Hennessey chose to focus on projects in Scotland, and ironic that he cited the CityWatch scheme being launched in Glasgow in September. The future of CityWatch has been in doubt for the past year; that it is to go ahead at all is despite, rather than because of, the Government.
Mr Hennessey's comment that 'the city is investing pounds 500,000 in the project' tells only part of the story. In fact, funding currently in place totals pounds 560,000, comprising pounds 100,000 each from the Glasgow Development Agency, Glasgow City Council and Strathclyde Regional Council, plus pounds 260,000 from the retail sector. This leaves a budget shortfall of more than pounds 200,000, which the Scottish Office was asked to meet. The request was refused, with the result that the original project, planned to run for an initital period of three years, has had to be curtailed to a one-year pilot scheme.
Nor is Glasgow alone in being short-changed in this way by the Scottish Office. This contrasts sharply with England, where the Home Secretary recently announced 40 new projects, largely funded through Urban Crime Grants and the Single Regeneration Budget. There is no equivalent funding for Scotland, despite pleas to the Scottish Officefrom local authorities, agencies and MPs.
The Government's claims that crime prevention is high on its agenda are hollow when tested against Glasgow's needs.
Yours sincerely,
MIKE WATSON
MP for Glasgow Central (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
7 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments