LETTER : BSE: facts or opinions?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In the haze of speculation about possible links between BSE and Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) it is hard to distinguish fact from opinion. Dr Grant's argument (27 March), that very few BSE-exposed individuals will develop CJD because only those of a rare genetic constitution are susceptible, is based on conjecture. It is true that CJD may occasionally run in families. However the extremely high incidence of this disease - one in a hundred - in those unfortunate children treated with contaminated human growth hormone suggests that genetic susceptibility is either of no relevance to transmission, or if relevant is far more common than Dr Grant would have us believe.
Dr P D Lewis
Consultant Neuropathologist
London NW3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments