Letter: Britain's republic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: To demonstrate that a republic needs no figurehead, Spencer Hagard (Letters, 12 September) cites the first time Britain was a republic, from 1649 to 1653. It is not a choice which helps his argument, as during that long period Parliament did nothing else of note but to send Cromwell (of whom they were afraid) and his army (ditto) on infamous punitive missions to Ireland and to Scotland, the adverse consequences of which have been reflected in every news bulletin of the last seven days.
As well for them that they kept Cromwell abroad, because when he did return he at once took over Parliament personally. With armed soldiers he entered the House, arrested the Speaker, dissolved the Parliament, locked the doors and pocketed the keys. Shortly afterwards he formed a new parliament - the "Barebones" - but when it quickly became clear that it was not going to vote him into power, he dismissed it too, and ordered his council of officers to elect him Lord Protector.
Hardly an auspicious start to our first and only republic. Like the Germans in the early Thirties to whom Donald Foreman (Letters, 10 September) refers, Parliament found they could not get the genie back into the bottle.
GORDON MEDCALF
Whitchurch, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments