Letter: Britain and Europe: the sceptics reply

Nigel Spearing Mp
Thursday 19 September 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Not all opponents of EMU or the European Union advocate walking away from Europe. Indeed all such have an obligation to advertise its nature, operation, and effects. All three are supra-national; over time they will suppress any remaining genuine international element.

Lord Howe has said we should not "lock ourselves out of the debate" on EMU. Is "sign up or shut up" appropriate language within any democratic community?

Alas the rules of this unique Community-Union show that it is centralist, authoritarian and unitary - already well beyond the feared, and disclaimed, federal. Even the vaunted democracy is non-operative. Current or future electorates cannot, in practice, obtain objectives or aspire to legislation contrary to the complex terms of Union treaties or laws.

These unhappy facts must be demonstrated clearly to all our European friends. Your signatories, having approved all three treaties without mandate from people, Parliament, or even their own party cannot easily do so, or deny the constitutional truth.

Let us applaud the risks that some of them, and others of their generation, took to obtain pan-European freedom in the war of 1939-45. At the same time we must deplore and unmask the fallacies of their adopted means of ensuring peace and concord into the 21st century. Unfortunately its effects are more likely to impede, or even destroy, the attainment of its highly advertised purposes.

NIGEL SPEARING MP

(Newham South, Lab)

House of Commons

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in