Leading article: An amusing little concoction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HERE IS a story to cheer anyone who has plumped blindly for the third-cheapest wine on the list, and nodded knowingly at the pleasant yet entirely unexpected taste when asked to sample it. Edward Jeffries was fined pounds 4,750 under the Trades Descriptions Act this week for selling wine from a kit as "estate grown" on his Cornish vineyard. That's right, a Cornish vineyard. Suspicion about the feasibility of such a project - it turns out you can't grow grapes in those parts - prompted trading standards officers to investigate this appellation incontrolee. It turned out Mr Jeffries had resorted to a do-it-yourself wine-making kit, added sugar and water, and sold the results for upwards of pounds 5 a bottle.
Now, most of us have no idea what English wine is supposed to taste like, beyond a vague folk memory of something undrinkable called Concord in the Seventies. Many of us, in truth, would have difficulty telling a Chilean Merlot from a tin of boot polish. As long as Chateau Jeffries used good- quality kits, everyone was happy. Especially Mr Jeffries, making a pounds 30,000- a-year profit from following simple instructions and sticking on bogus labels.
Even the prosecution had to admit to Falmouth magistrates: "People were buying what they had tasted and liked." It seems churlish, then, to complain that the wording on the label did not correspond precisely with the contents. For most people the whole point of drinking is to get away from such unnecessary attention to detail. Another glass anyone?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments