Odd couple: Michael Gove's Whitehall counterpart strikes at his legacy

 

Editorial
Friday 09 January 2015 01:19 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The marriage of Michael Gove, as Secretary of State for Education, and Sir David Bell, as his Permanent Secretary, was evidently not one made in heaven. Sir David, who worked for Mr Gove for just the first year of the minister’s tenure, does not name him, but it seems clear who he has in mind, in remarks released today.

To quote him: “The idea that academic excellence was only valued by a small coterie holed up in Westminster was as insulting as it was wrong… whether intended or not, the unfortunate impression was allowed to develop that teachers didn’t care about standards.”

Even Mr Gove’s critics, a crowded field, ought to concede that his bunker mentality was born of frustration at the failure of the education establishment – which he termed the “blob” – to help prepare a workforce that could compete, in that well-worn but valid phrase, in the “global race”. But if there is a lesson from his removal from the post of Education Secretary, it is that true, long-lasting reform requires collaboration. Had he been less haughty, Mr Gove might still have the job – and British education would be the better for it.

Not every aspect of Mr Gove’s style is to be abjured, however. He seems to have been one of those ministers the Civil Service doesn’t like, who takes his government’s programme seriously. He didn’t, as Tony Benn is supposed to have in 1974, simply hand the Civil Service his party’s manifesto and tell them to get on with it. He was doing his job.

Likewise, the Civil Service is there to say to ministers, when they are being silly, “no”. Politicians don’t like that, but Sir David, too, was doing his job. Maybe they were a good match after all.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in