Leading article: A vote that must not be marred by age-old grievances
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In a move quite as historic as the opening of Scotland's Parliament almost 13 years ago, the First Minister, Alex Salmond, chose the birthday of Robert Burns to reveal the question he intends to ask voters in the promised referendum. It is, as he said, short, straightforward and clear: "Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?"
Much can happen between now and 2014, when the referendum is to be held. The vote and the question must be approved by Westminster. Mr Salmond has not ruled out a third option, offering something just short of independence. The coming months will provide many opportunities to revive Anglo-Scottish grievances. But this unprecedented vote must be approached by all sides in a spirit of generosity and strict legality. Any change in Scotland's status must be born in reason, not resentment. And if Scots vote to remain in the UK, that decision should be welcomed, too.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments