Tony Juniper: We needed promises of hard cash. All we got was a fudge

Analysis

Saturday 31 October 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The EU summit yesterday managed to fudge a deal on climate change finance. There was no mention of what the EU will be prepared to pay, and without numbers one is left wondering how much progress has been made since the original Framework Convention on Climate Change was thrashed out in Rio de Janeiro more than 17 years ago.

That treaty stated: "The developed country Parties... shall provide new and additional financial resources to meet the agreed full costs incurred by developing country Parties in complying with their obligations". This commitment was made in relation to adaptation and the low-carbon technology transfer that would enable developing countries to "leap frog" the dirtiest phases of development. The trouble is, it hasn't happened.

The reluctance of EU countries this week to make a clear commitment on the subject of climate change finance before the Copenhagen climate change summit provides yet another example of the disastrous political short-termism and self-interest which has dogged the climate change finance issue for nearly two decades.

It is instructive to note the contrast between the way in which EU leaders leapt to the defence of the financial system last year, and their response to the challenge we face now in securing a fair and effective climate change treaty. Last year they opened their cheque books on our behalf without even blinking. This week the danger is far more profound. It's about the survival of human civilisations – yet the leadership has evaporated.

Each country that has expressed reluctance to talk numbers has its own reasons for not acting decisively. Some say it's better to wait until Copenhagen before setting out the EU's specific negotiating stance. But if the EU cannot agree a common position based on what it is prepared to pay at one of its own summits, do European leaders really believe they will be in any better position to form a clear collective position when they arrive in Copenhagen?

The propensity for crisis management and delaying leadership in the face of an existing threat does not work for climate change. While it was possible to bail out the banks, creating stability in the Earth's climate system will not be so straightforward. This crisis must be dealt with before it happens. The climate science tells us that we are now at the last tick of the clock. The risks that some EU countries are prepared to take as we approach what could be our last chance to avoid catastrophe not only betray a short-term mentality, they are illogical, immoral and ill-informed. Vague statements of intent are not enough. It's time to stump up the cash.

Tony Juniper is an author, environmental campaigner and sustainability adviser

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in