Christian Wolmar: It's a tough ask for the rail companies to sell more tickets while hiking fares

Wednesday 21 January 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The meeting yesterday between the train operators and transport ministers was the first in what is likely to be an elaborate game of cat and mouse played against the backdrop of the recession.

Railways always do badly in economic downturns because they have fixed assets and costs while passenger numbers normally fall sharply as people cut work and leisure travel. And this is the first time the rail companies are faced with the possibility of fewer passengers since they took over from British Rail in the mid-1990s. During the last recession in the late 1980s, the then Tory government responded by cutting back on investment to British Rail while allowing the deficit to soar.

That option is no longer open to the Government. The private franchise companies have signed contracts of, mostly, seven years, and the investment funding paid to Network Rail, the infrastructure company, is fixed by a regulator. Private companies bear much of the risk of any loss of revenue.

It is bad news for them that they have signed increasingly bullish franchise contracts based on the assumption that revenue would grow at 3 to 5 per cent above inflation. To achieve this, they have to attract increasing numbers of passengers, and have to put up fares in real terms, as witnessed by the recent rises averaging over 6 per cent.

Keith Ludeman, the head of Go Ahead which has the majority stake in two of the big three south-of-the-Thames commuter services, has said the contracts are renegotiable. Ministers have stressed that the deals are immutable.

Ministers will be able to stick to that line if just a single company gets into trouble, but they would be in a very difficult position if several operators threatened to throw in the towel. That would risk the fragile edifice of rail franchising, and the industry has already been part-renationalised when Railtrack went bust in 2002 and was replaced by the not-for-profit Network Rail.

Christian Wolmar is the author of Fire and Steam, a history of the railways in Britain published by Atlantic, £8 99

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in