Hospitals should spend little, but spend it well

It's difficult to understand how these institutions can spend relatively large sums on food, but deliver such a terribly low result

Lisa Markwell
Thursday 18 October 2012 13:42 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Would it be terribly sour of me to say I don't care about The Great British Bake Off? I haven't been caught up in the frenzy like the rest of the country, so whether Brendan's buns were cheated of the title by John's heaven and hell cake has had no impact on my life.

I've nothing against baking, but other food matters have been on my mind. Last week, when I wrote a column about the news that food prices are rocketing after the terrible summer, I got some astounding responses. It concentrates the mind when, for instance, @OurSouthend tweets to tell me that she is feeding herself and her toddler on £7 a week. (She has a blog, agirlcalledjack.com, which makes for compelling, if sobering, reading).

Chiffon cakes and French fancies don't appear much on that menu, I imagine. Nor on hospital menus either. Yesterday we heard that hospitals are spending, as the headline in i said, "less than £5 a day on meals". I have to say, I was amazed it is ever that much.

Given the bulk purchasing that must go on, and the mass production, I would have thought it possible to create healthy, filling meals for much less. Porridge or granary toast for breakfast, veggie curry and brown rice for lunch, mackerel or turkey for dinner with salad and a baked potato. Bowls of seasonal fruit, and nut and seeds bars with tea.

Of course, many food experts have struggled to make any impact on hospital catering. But it is difficult to understand how relatively large sums are spent (£15.65 a day at Barts; £7.64 at Great Ormond Street) with such a terribly low result, health-wise.

The picture above is of the dinner I was served at St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, recently. A spongy white bread sandwich with a tuna filling (allegedly); pudding was a pink and white swirl of what can only be described at whipped lard. (It reminded me that on an earlier visit a wise long-term patient advised me to order the halal food, always a nice hot veggie curry.)

Half a tin of economy tuna costs 25p; two slices of white bread 27p, salad cream dollop 5p. Whoever created that heinous pud cannot charge more than 30p. So dinner cost around 87p. Three times a day, £2.61. So where is the money going?

With food price hikes, and pressure on the NHS like never before, it's wrong-headed to demand hospitals spend more than £5 a day on food. But they could spend it more cleverly. Stop trying to serve Pret-like food, just plain, good stuff. By the way, I priced "my" menu from Tesco: it cost £3.94.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in