The war of the words
'"Mangled history, slapstick, pathos, inspired lying, jeering..." If that is not a true description of Parliament, then I am a banana'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I have recently received many letters from readers about the impending war against Iraq, and would like to print a few of them today...
I have recently received many letters from readers about the impending war against Iraq, and would like to print a few of them today...
From Major-General Sir Tom Peartree
Sir, We keep hearing that before a war on Iraq commences, we must have a full debate in Parliament.
Now, we all know that Parliament is full of people who have never run anything in their lives, and are now in charge of running the country – no wonder the railways do not work – but, by the same token, is it not also full of people who have never fought a war in their lives? Why do we entrust the declaration of war to people who could not get a squad of six men together to arrest a drunk driver?
The Labour MPs who form the Parliamentary majority have about as much experience of war as the England cricket team. I wouldn't ask either of them for an expert opinion on anything to do with war. (Or cricket either, come to that.) The whole thing is becoming a pantomime.
Yours, etc
From Mr Barnard Manning (no relation)
Sir, I must object in the strongest possible terms to the previous letter-writer, when he contemptuously describes the goings on in Parliament as a "pantomime". We at the British Pantomime Heritage Trust take the history of pantomime very seriously, as it reflects the eclectic character of our nation so well. Its blend of mangled history, slapstick, pathos, inspired lying, music, cross-dressing and audience jeering is a wonderful art- istic creation of which any nation should be proud. To use the word pantomime as an insult is farcical.
Yours, etc
From Mrs Kathy Wordley
Sir, I was nodding in agreement with the last letter until I came to his final amazing statement. How can a champion of pantomime attack anything as "farcical"? If there is one other theatrical achievement of which the British can be proud it is the art of farce, which is comedy raised almost to the level of ballet. Please do NOT use "farce" as a condemnation.
By the way, Mr Manning (no relation) says Parliament should not be described as pantomime as pantomime is a blend of "mangled history, slapstick, pathos, inspired lying, jeering" etc. If that is not a true description of Parliament, then I am a banana.
Yours, etc
From Señor Diego de Fortubal de Garcia de Salida de Entrada etc
Sir, As the secretary of the Banana Secretariat, it is my painful duty yet again to spring to the defence of this unjustly treated fruit.
Of all fruits it is the most beneficial to man for energy, and yet it is the most insulted. "Then I am a banana!" said Mr Hislop. "You are bananas!" says everyone. "They are a banana republic!" says everyone else. And think of the banana skin and all those jokes. Why does no one say "You are pineapples"? Or "Then I am a passion fruit"? The whole thing makes me, as you English say, as sick as a parrot.
Yours, etc
From Mrs Edith Crumly
Sir, We at the Parrot Defence League – but I am sure I do not have to spell out my objections to the previous writer. The parrot is one of the healthiest and hardiest of all birds. He would have to be, to withstand the treatment meted out to him by cruel and heartless humans. It is not parrots who are sick, it is their thoughtless owners. I do not give a fig for them.
Yours, etc
From Sir Digby Loftus, Chairman Fruit Board
Sir, So it's open season on figs again, is it? Why is it always figs that get it in the neck (when it isn't bananas, with deference to my old friend Diego)? "I couldn't give a fig", people always say. But they should! It is the most thoughtful, delicious present you can give anyone. Always give figs. You will not go far wrong.
Yours, etc
From Mrs Betty Jones
Sir, May I protest vehemently against the use of the expression "to welsh on someone", which is a direct slur on the entire Welsh nation? I realise that nobody has actually used the expression. I also realise that I may leave myself open to charges of the Welsh being over-sensitive about things, and even occasionally having a chip on our shoulder. And it may be fair to say that we do go on and on about things sometimes. However...
Miles Kington writes: I am afraid that's all we have space for today on the war against Iraq. But do keep writing in to me!
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments