Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Is Emirates' offer of 90,000 miles adequate compensation?

Travel Q&A

Tuesday 03 June 2014 17:21 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Q. My wife and I were flying back from Brisbane to Dubai on Emirates. After a four-hour wait we were told that the flight was cancelled. Emirates arranged for a hotel, breakfast and transport. We finally left 18 hours late and missed our connection to Heathrow. Emirates offered us 45,000 air miles each as a gesture of goodwill. As this delay in my view was Emirates' fault, am I entitled to compensation or should I just accept the offer? Andrew Whitfield

A. Most claims for cancellations and long delays are made under the European passenger-rights legislation, but this is no use as you were neither flying from an EU airport, nor on a European airline. The rules apply to departures from European airports (regardless of the carrier), and to European airlines on any route (eg British Airways from Sydney to Heathrow). But a UAE-based airline flying from Australia certainly does not qualify.

The Montreal Convention – the global treaty on aviation – mentions in Article 19 that an airline is liable for "damage occasioned by delay", so in theory you could pursue a claim for the losses sustained. But looking at the impact on your plans, any compensation would be modest. You are probably best advised simply to accept the airline's offer – which, by the standards of such cases, looks generous.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in