Hong Kong tycoon sues Google for libel over ‘triad’ search result
When Albert Yeung Sau-shing entered his name into the search engine, its auto complete algorithm suggested the term associated with organised crime
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When Hong Kong business tycoon Albert Yeung Sau-shing googled his name, the auto complete feature suggested the word “triad”, a term that is associated with organised crime. Now he is suing the search engine for libel.
Mr Yeung is head of Emperor Group, a sprawling business empire dealing in property, entertainment and finance. He has been found guilty of crimes including illegal bookmaking, perverting the course of public justice and insider trading.
Google tried to have the case dismissed, but in Hong Kong this week Deputy High Court Judge Marlene Ng said it could go to trial. The decision follows a trend in overseas courts sympathetic to those who want to hold Google responsible for what the net says about them.
To prove libel in Hong Kong – and the United States – you have to show the accused published a defamatory statement about you. At issue in this case is whether Google can be regarded as the “publisher” of terms suggested by its search algorithm. Google says it cannot “publish” libelous search results because it uses automated search algorithms without human input.
Mr Yeung argues Google has control over suggested search terms because it designed the search algorithm. Therefore, he says, Google is the “publisher” of search results.
© Washington Post
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments