Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

George North concussion: Remove the risk? Not without diluting the sport

Rugby is not American football: from a very early age, players are instructed not to tackle opponents with their heads

Chris Hewett
Wednesday 01 April 2015 23:36 BST
Comments
George North receiving medical treatment last Friday
George North receiving medical treatment last Friday (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

How long should George North spend watching rugby, rather than playing it? Is he unusually prone to concussion, or plain unlucky? Is the union game facing a fundamental problem that could – and should – lead to its enforced mollification, or is it in the throes of health and safety-induced panic?

The answer to the first, most immediately pressing of these questions is simple: let the specialists decide. As Jim Mallinder, the Northampton rugby director who signed North a couple of seasons ago, quite reasonably suggested, an informed assessment by a qualified neurologist with full access to the player’s medical records might carry just a little more weight than the views of opinionated outsiders with axes to grind and agendas to pursue. After all, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

If it is found that North’s concussion history poses a significant threat to his wellbeing, he will have two choices: pack it in voluntarily and do something else for a living, or allow someone in authority to make the call for him. Rugby demands pretty much everything of a sportsman, but equally it is possible for a human being to give too much of himself to rugby.

As for the union code itself, there is a growing risk of it talking itself into voluntary emasculation. Rugby is not American football: from a very early age, players are instructed not to tackle opponents with their heads; by definition, concussion incidents are either accidental or caused by a miscreant acting outside the laws of the game. It might just about be possible to remove 99 per cent of the risk of such accidents occurring, but not without diluting the sport to the point of unrecognisability.

Those who say that rugby is a victim of its own dramatic progress in the realm of fitness and conditioning – who quake at the sight of unusually powerful and unprecedentedly dynamic full-time professional athletes clattering into each other with such little regard for their own safety – have a case.

But so does Mallinder when he insists that his club are doing right by North.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in