FA considers case against Jewell for referee remarks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The investigation into Paul Jewell's criticism of the referee Phil Dowd at the Emirates Stadium on Sunday would seem one of the more straightforward cases the Football Association's disciplinary department will face this season. Nevertheless, the governing body was yesterday keen to be seen to be following procedure.
There will be no comment until a transcript of the Wigan manager's comments and the referee's report have been studied. This process may be finished today. Jewell can then expect to receive a letter asking him to explain such comments as "Dowd has cost our team the points" and his description of the Staffordshire official as "the worst referee in the League".
Jewell said that his response would be to send the FA a tape of Wigan's 2-1 defeat to Arsenal.
There are two possible punishments. If Dowd reports that Jewell behaved badly on the touchline or insulted him when the pair spoke as they left the pitch, the Wigan manager can expect a touchline ban. If he is merely censured for his post-match comments, he will be fined. The current record fine for making comments to a referee is £20,000, levied on Graeme Souness in June 2005 after Barry Knight refereed Newcastle's defeat at Everton.
Jewell's chairman, Dave Whelan, said yesterday: "This particular referee seems to get it wrong quite a lot and surely they have to look at his performances over the season.
"It is disappointing when you get a penalty that is such a nailed-on penalty and it is not given. You wonder what the hell goes on. Do they not like giving penalties at places like Manchester United and Arsenal?"
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments