Football: New writ for Venables

Wednesday 21 May 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Terry Venables is facing another courtroom battle, this time with former Portsmouth director Terry Brady, who is seeking repayment of a loan he says he made to the First Division club.

Brady left the board at Fratton Park last October after clashing with the then managing director, Martin Gregory, over the money available for new signings. He had been a director at Fratton Park for only eight months, after providing an interest-free pounds 500,000 loan to help the club buy Martin Allen from West Ham.

Now Brady is demanding Pompey pay back the money he claims they owe him. But the club are fighting the writ, saying the money was not a loan but an investment to buy shares.

The case appeared briefly before the Chancery Division of the High Court in London, but was adjourned for a second hearing. Now the two sides will meet to try to sort out the dispute over the money.

Nick Trainer, Portsmouth's solicitor, warned yesterday that the dispute could take up to two years to settle.

Trainer said no shares were ever issued to Brady because the club were unsure how much he was prepared to invest, but added that Brady could have whatever shares he had paid for.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in