Cricket World Cup 2015: South Africa rout Sri Lanka by nine wickets to reach semi-finals and end Kumar Sangakkara's ODI career
Sri Lanka 133 all-out (37.2 overs), South Africa 134-1 (18 overs)
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Much more of this and the chokers will be consigned to history forever. South Africa were exemplary in all that they did yesterday in crushing Sri Lanka in the first quarter-final of the World Cup.
It could be said that Sri Lanka erred in everything from the moment they selected their team, but that would not do justice to a clinical exhibition from their opponents who embraced the occasion rather than be cowed by it.
There is a traditional closeness between these teams – there was a gap of one in wins and losses between them coming into this match – but in levelling the tally at 29-29, South Africa were completely dominant. They were stifling with the ball, whether quick or slow, and then won at a gallop in chasing down a paltry total of 133.
The match lasted a total of 55.2 overs. It was like something England could have been involved in. As a way for the old warriors, Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara, to depart the one-day stage together, after 852 appearances between them, it was extraordinarily sad.
Sangakkara, as ever, was as phlegmatic in defeat as he would have been in victory. His disappointment was tempered by the knowledge that South Africa had played with wonderful force.
“It’s disappointing to lose, especially in a quarter-final,” he said, “but to win against a side like South Africa we have to do really well. We have to compete.
“There was a stage, even – when we were four wickets down – where we probably could have gone through the powerplay and maybe got to the 240-250 mark. And we were expecting, as much as anyone, of ourselves. But we weren’t good enough today.”
Sri Lanka won what seemed to be an important toss. But that was the best it became for them all day. Fatally, it seemed, they changed their batting order, splitting up the opening partnership that had seen them reach this stage. Boldly, they included a fast bowler, Dushmantha Chameera, who had played two one-day matches, and a spinner, Tharindu Kaushal, who had played none.
South Africa were fierce at the start. The veins in Dale Steyn’s forehead bulged, which is always a sure sign he means business. He did. He and his new ball partner, Kyle Abbott, were helped by two early, magnificently athletic catches which defined South Africa as much as anything else.
The spinners, from whom Sri Lanka thought they might profit, were instead suffocating. Sangakkara, who had scored four successive hundreds before this, needed all his experience but was never fluent or settled. Imran Tahir, a leg-spinner with a devilish googly, was mesmerising, J P Duminy, an off-spinner expected to go for plenty, took a hat-trick.
South Africa clattered their way to the 134 target in 18 overs. A B de Villiers had said they would not follow their forebears by choking, has spoken indeed of when, rather than if, they win the World Cup. He can be believed.
Sangakkara was asked how he would like to be remembered. “Oh, if anyone can say that they’ve enjoyed playing against me and playing with me, I’ll be more than happy.” It was a typically dignified sign-off.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments