Reactor explosion `could never happen again'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHRISTOPHER BELLAMY
Defence Correspondent
The Chernobyl nuclear disaster could not be repeated, either at Chernobyl itself or elsewhere in the former Soviet bloc, the Chairman of the World Association of Nuclear Operators (Wano) said yesterday in a statement marking the tenth anniversary of the world's worst nuclear accident. Technical improvements to the installations and the growth of a Western- style "safety culture" meant that the accident "as it happened in 1986, cannot happen again".
But the Chernobyl explosion has received less attention than other nuclear sites in the former Soviet Union because of the economic situation in Ukraine. Similar reactors - RBMKs - in Russia itself had received more modifications. Although the European Union had put about pounds 5m into improving nuclear installations in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, the same amount again was needed.
Remy Carle, the chairman of the voluntary association which unites 126 operators of nuclear power plants around the world, was addressing a meeting of the association in London yesterday, the last before the anniversary of the accident on 26 April. He said the cost of redeploying workers, closing the plant and replacing it, estimated at $1bn - had discouraged the idea.
"The main causes of the accident have disappeared - the deficiencies have been corrected," Mr Carle said.
He said the main design shortcomings of the RBMK reactor, conceived in the 1960s and built in the 1970s, were the design of the control rods and the "void coefficient". Before the accident, the control rods could cause a sharp increase in radioactivity when they were lowered into a reactor operating at low power. This can no longer happen.
The "void coefficient" is the change in reactivity - the intensity of the nuclear chain reaction - which accompanies a change in the density of the liquid circulating round the reactor core - the "primary coolant". When water turned to steam, reactivity would increase as the density of the coolant decreased. This could create a positive void coefficient, which could cause the reactor to become unstable. Steps taken meant this was now impossible. Attention had also been paid to fire-retardant measures.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments