The vote-winning machine defeated by his arrogance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.So total was Göran Persson's domination of Swedish politics over the past decade that his nickname, roughly translated, means "he who decides".
In office for longer than Tony Blair, Mr Persson was the EU's second-longest serving premier after Luxembourg's Jean-Claude Junker. And, as leader of the Swedish Social Democrats, he headed one of the most successful vote winning machines in modern political history.
To many - himself probably included - Mr Persson seemed invincible. But last night the 57-year-old premier fell victim to the old adage that all political careers end in failure.
Though the election was closely fought, it was becoming increasingly clear that Mr Persson's longevity was a liability. Not only was the Swedish electorate becoming bored of their Prime Minister, he had also gained a reputation for arrogance.
His government had been on the defensive since the tsunami 18 months ago when ministers were slated for their slow response to a catastrophe that took many Swedish lives.
And the young, media-friendly and centrist opposition leader,n Fredrik Reinfeldt, exploited the government's unpopularity.
The main campaign battleground was unemployment where Mr Reinfeldt promised more jobs and modest reform of the benefit system. Though Mr Persson tried to paint his challenger as a wrecker of Sweden's popular welfare state, it didn't wash. By refusing to discuss a coalition with his political allies on the left, Mr Persson handed an advantage to Mr Reinfeldt who had a deal with his centre-right allies.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments