Judge rejects bid for Jackson charges to be thrown out for 'lack of evidence'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The judge in Michael Jackson's child abuse trial has rejected a defence motion for an acquittal made on the ground that the prosecution witnesses lacked credibility.
The judge in Michael Jackson's child abuse trial has rejected a defence motion for an acquittal made on the ground that the prosecution witnesses lacked credibility.
Superior Court Judge Rodney S Melville then immediately called in the jury to begin hearing the defence case.
Robert Sanger, for the defence, had argued that witnesses such as the flight attendant Cynthia Bell, the former Jackson employee Jesus Salas, and Mr Jackson's former wife, Deborah Rowe, were called by the prosecution but gave testimony favorable to Jackson.
"The smoking gun evidence that these witnesses were supposed to present just didn't come through," he said. The judge responded that he was reluctant to make a decision about the credibility of the witnesses, suggesting that was the jury's job. Defence motions for acquittal are common when the prosecution rests, but are rarely successful.
The appeal came a day after prosecutors rested their case against Mr Jackson, who is on trial for allegedly molesting a boy, now 15, who spent time at his Neverland Ranch and appeared with him in the 2003 British television documentary Living With Michael Jackson.
The 46-year-old pop star has pleaded not guilty to 10 charges that include felony conspiracy with 28 overt acts involving child abduction, false imprisonment and extortion.
Further delays to the trial, which has already taken 10 weeks, were in prospect after questions were raised about one of the jurors, who could now be removed.
ABC News reported that a key witness, who testified that the singer molested him when he was a child, and a sister of juror number 11 work together in a small car-parts shop. This could lead to the removal of the juror, a 20-year-old Hispanic male cashier. "The fix would be to excuse the juror and substitute one of the alternates," Robert Ray, a lawyer, told ABC.
Court observers say Judge Melville needs to ask the juror what he knows immediately.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments