Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Breach of court rules set to spare life of '20th hijacker' Moussaoui

Rupert Cornwell
Tuesday 14 March 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"I do not want to act precipitously, but it is very difficult for this case to go forward," a visibly angry Judge Leonie Brinkema said yesterday as she scheduled a special hearing for today. Some legal experts expect she will terminate the current penalty phase trial, meaning that by default, Moussaoui will be sentenced to life imprisonment.

Judge Brinkema told the court in Alexandria, Virginia, that a lawyer for the Transportation Security Administration sent e-mails to seven Federal Aviati on Administration officials due to testify in the case, setting out the prosecution's opening statements and providing commentary on government witnesses from the first day of testimony. The action explicitly breached her pre-trial order barring witnesses from exposure to any opening statements or trial testimony.

Moussaoui, often referred to as the "20th hijacker", was arrested in August 2001, a month before the attacks on New York and Washington. The government is seeking the death penalty on the grounds that if he had fully co-operated with investigators then, the 11 September attacks could have been stopped. He denies specific knowledge of the plans.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in