Threat to fertility help for single people dropped
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE DEPARTMENT of Health has backed down on its threat to stop people who are not in stable relationships receiving fertility treatment on the NHS, writes Celia Hall.
Yesterday Baroness Cumberlege, Under-Secretary of State for Health, said that doctors must decide who has the treatment. 'Unless Parliament approves, I doubt whether there will be a ban on fertility treatment for single people,' she told the Institute of Health Service Managers in London.
However, two months ago, Tom Sackville, also an Under-Secretary of State, made it clear that 'health authorities should think carefully before providing fertility treatment to people without a stable family background'. He said: 'If there is evidence that this is not being followed we will examine what further action needs to be taken.'
He was speaking after the row over the case of a woman who had given birth to sextuplets after NHS fertility treatments. It emerged that she was not married to the father and not living with him.
Lady Cumberlege's statement yesterday indicated a softer line. She said: 'Is it wrong to correct a defect in an unmarried person, perhaps a young girl, so she has the opportunity to have children in future? At the moment doctors are required to define a stable relationship before treatment is given. A marriage may be unstable and stability may be sought through having a family, which may not be the solution.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments