Savings target different to Osborne’s austerity-era cuts, says Reeves
The Chancellor said there would be a ‘real-terms increase’ in Government spending despite departments being told to meet the target.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rachel Reeves has insisted her call for Whitehall departments to find savings of 5% was different from cuts under austerity-era Tory chancellor George Osborne.
The Chancellor said there would be a “real-terms increase” in Government spending despite departments being told to meet the target in order to drive out “waste”.
Ms Reeves and Treasury Chief Secretary Darren Jones have begun work on a sweeping multi-year spending review which will be published in 2025.
Speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, she downplayed comparisons between her approach and that of David Cameron’s chancellor Mr Osborne.
“The difference here is that we’re not asking for cuts because we’ve set real-terms increases to Government spending. George Osborne cut government spending,” she said.
“Real-terms spending will increase during the course of this Parliament, but we need to drive out wasteful spending so that we can redeploy waste to productive things that Government do.”
Ms Reeves said she had “no doubt” departments would be able to identify the necessary savings so spending could instead be focused on the Government’s priorities.
I have no doubt that we can find efficiency savings within Government spending of 5% and I’m determined to do so. Because it’s through finding those efficiency savings that we will have the money to spend on the priorities of the British people
But the Treasury acknowledged that would inevitably mean “difficult” decisions – suggesting the axe would fall in areas which were not part of Sir Keir Starmer’s “missions” for government.
The Chancellor, visiting a Kent hospital on Tuesday, said: “I have no doubt that we can find efficiency savings within Government spending of 5% and I’m determined to do so.
“Because it’s through finding those efficiency savings that we will have the money to spend on the priorities of the British people.
“So part of this spending review will be cracking down on waste, cracking down on non-priority spending, so that we can focus on the issues – whether that is improving living standards, ensuring our streets are safe, or indeed reducing waiting times in the NHS.
“Those are the people’s priorities, and that is what we will be focusing on in the spending review.”
Every pound of departmental spending would face a “line-by-line review”, with external experts brought in to scrutinise budgets as Ms Reeves vowed to use an “iron fist” to squeeze out waste.
“We’ve set the budget for this parliament. Public Services now need to live within that spending envelope that’s been set out, and that means ruthlessly focusing on the priorities of this government and of the British people,” she said.
Launching the next phase of the review, Ms Reeves said: “The previous government allowed millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money to go to waste on poor-value-for-money projects. We will not tolerate it; I said I would have an iron grip on the public finances and that means taking an iron fist against waste.”
Under the Treasury’s plans, departments would ensure budgets were examined by “challenge panels” of experts including former bosses from Lloyds Banking Group, Barclays Bank and the Co-operative Group.
These panels would advise on which spending “is or isn’t necessary”, the ministry said.
Shadow Treasury chief secretary Richard Fuller said: “Delivering value for money for the taxpayer is a noble goal, but Rachel Reeves’s record so far has been to dole out inflation-busting pay rises to Labour’s union paymasters whilst mandating nothing in return, and making no reforms to public sector productivity or welfare spending.”
Ms Reeves also dismissed parallels drawn between the Government’s appointment of outsiders to review spending and US President-elect Donald Trump bringing businessman Elon Musk into his inner circle.
“You’re bringing in outsiders to make savings, you’re like Donald Trump bringing an Elon Musk aren’t you?” 5 Live presenter Matt Chorley asked her.
“I think it is perfectly sensible to bring in people who have done spending reviews in the private sector, in their businesses, to give us a fresh pair of eyes on what government are spending money on, and to help drive efficiency improvements,” the Chancellor said.
So-called 'senior bankers' were responsible for the 2008 financial crash and continue to rake in mind-blowing sums in bonuses. And that's who Rachel Reeves has picked to tell public services to spend less money
“I don’t think that many people are going to compare me to Donald Trump, for using British business people to help get value for money.”
The Green Party criticised the decision to draft in bankers to assess public spending and accused the Government of “austerity 2.0”.
In a post on X, the party said: “So-called ‘senior bankers’ were responsible for the 2008 financial crash and continue to rake in mind-blowing sums in bonuses.
“And that’s who Rachel Reeves has picked to tell public services to spend less money. The country didn’t vote for austerity 2.0.”