Prime Minister putting ‘vanity before country’ by delaying election, says Starmer
The Labour leader suggested Rishi Sunak wants to mark two years in Downing Street before going to the country.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Prime Minister is putting “vanity before country” if he is waiting to clock up two years in Downing Street before calling an election, Sir Keir Starmer has said.
It comes after Rishi Sunak, who became Prime Minister in October 2022, said it was his “working assumption” that he would call a general election in the second half of the year.
The stance opens the door to a potential autumn general election.
I can’t help feeling that all he really wants to do is to get two years clocked up of his own premiership, and that means he is putting vanity before country
Sir Keir, the Labour Party leader, said Britain was drifting while the country waited to elect a new Westminster government.
Speaking to Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme, Sir Keir said he wanted an election “as soon as possible”, stating that he thought the “country is ready for it”.
He continued: “I have to say, the Prime Minister is sort of almost taking himself out of this — the ‘working assumption’ is as if it is somebody else’s working assumption.
“If he had a plan, he would set the date and he should set the date because at the moment it is very hard to see how him continuing in Government improves the lives of anybody in the country, so there is drift.
“I can’t help feeling that all he really wants to do is to get two years clocked up of his own premiership, and that means he is putting vanity before country.
“And so my challenge to him would be: if you’ve got a plan, set the date.
“If you haven’t got a plan, just get on with it as quickly as possible.”
The decision by the Conservative UK Government to bring forward the 2p cut in national insurance, announced in the autumn statement, from April to January 6 was seen by commentators at the time as a signal Mr Sunak could trigger a spring election.
An announcement last week that the Budget will be held on March 6 appeared to validate that theory further, paving the way for a general election to match up with local elections on May 2.
But the Prime Minister told broadcasters on Thursday that his “working assumption” was that he would call an election in the second half of 2024, ahead of the January 2025 deadline for a vote to be held.
Ahead of the contest, the Conservative Party has focused its political attacks on Labour’s pledge to invest £28 billion annually into green energy if Sir Keir becomes prime minister, with some of the money coming through borrowing.
Labour had promised in 2021 to invest £28 billion a year until 2030 in green projects if it came to power, but last year Ms Reeves said the figure would instead be a target to work towards in the second half of a first parliament.
Sir Keir said he is “absolutely” ready to defend Labour’s green pledges in a general election campaign, saying: “If they want that fight, bring it on.”
The Opposition leader said he was not prepared to relax his party’s target of having Britain running on clean power by 2030 — a transition he argued could save households money on their energy bills.
“It is absolutely clear to me that the Tories are trying to weaponise this issue, the £28 billion etcetera,” he told Sky.
“This is a fight I want to have.
“If we can have a fight going into the election between an incoming Labour government that wants to invest in the future long-term strategy that will lower our bills and give us energy independence versus stagnation, more of the same under this Government — if they want that fight on borrow-to-invest, I’m absolutely up for that fight.”
Tory Party chairman Richard Holden said: “This morning Keir Starmer recommitted to his 2030 energy promise and acknowledged it requires government spending to deliver.
“Labour’s own costing of this promise is £28 billion every year.
“Sir Keir Starmer was, again, not clear at all how he will pay for it given he also says he wants to keep debt falling – that can only mean thousands of pounds of higher taxes for every Briton.”