Whitehall ‘less effective’ because of job cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than one-third of civil servants believe the Government is botching its attempt to cut the size of Whitehall by allowing the most talented workers to leave.
A survey of more than 1,000 officials for Civil Service World found 35 per cent thought that the worst aspect of the redundancy programme was allowing “talented and skilled individuals” to leave. A similar number suggested that the programme had failed to “let poor performers go”.
Earlier this year, George Osborne announced a further 140,000 civil service job cuts on top of those already taking place as part of the 2010 spending review.
But the new survey suggests that there are widespread concerns over the process as well as fears that it could damage the ability of Whitehall departments to operate effectively.
Asked about the weakest aspects of the redundancy scheme, 35 per cent said “taking the opportunity to let poor performers go”, and the same proportion said “retaining talented and highly skilled individuals”.
In response to the survey, a Cabinet Office spokeswoman said the civil service had to “evolve and keep striving to better itself”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments