Railway warning system is rejected
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Labour Party conference rejected John Prescott's plans for rail safety yesterday in a rebuff to the Deputy Prime Minister.
The Labour Party conference rejected John Prescott's plans for rail safety yesterday in a rebuff to the Deputy Prime Minister.
Delegates urged the Government to introduce the fail-safe automatic train protection (ATP) system throughout the network and not just on high-speed lines.
The less expensive train protection warning system (TPWS) will be introduced on most lines under a multi-billion- pound scheme endorsed by the Government and the industry.
However, a combination of Labour's big union battalions and constituency delegates threw out the plan because it did not offer full protection for passengers. Rail unions pointed out that TPWS would not protect services going more than 75mph.
Vernon Hince, the assistant general secretary of RMT, the industry's biggest union, urged the Government to back the introduction of the more expensive ATP on all routes.
While Mr Prescott has acknowledged that TPWS is not as effective as ATP, he has only confirmed the installation of the up-to-date system on high-speed routes such as the London to Glasgow and Edinburgh services, the Great Western route between the capital and Wales and the new Channel Tunnel Rail Link. Mr Hince told the conference in Brighton that the best system would only cover a "small proportion of the network". Even the less effective TPWS would be fitted to only 40 per cent of signals on other routes, he said.
Mr Prescott said in his speech to the conference that the party should not try to pre-empt the inquiry into rail safety by Professor John Uff, who led the hearing into the 1997 Southall disaster, and Lord Cullen, who chaired the inquiry into last year's Paddington crash.
Safety had always been his top priority, Mr Prescott said, insisting that he was determined that Southall and Paddington should mark a watershed in the standards of passenger protection. "TPWS can save more lives than alternative systems that will take 10 years to install," he said. But the Government was prepared to back any recommendations made by the present inquiry into rail safety, he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments