Lib Dems fall out over who should take on George Osborne in election debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A row is brewing between Liberal Democrat MPs and grassroots supporters over who should take part in the would-be chancellors' television debate during next year's general election campaign.
As the minority coalition partner, the Lib Dems do not have a shadow chancellor. Nick Clegg must choose between the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, and the Business Secretary, Vince Cable, who represented the Lib Dems in the 2010 debate.
A senior activist said it was a "no-brainer" that it should be Mr Cable, because Mr Alexander has worked too closely with George Osborne to argue against him effectively. Stephen Tall, editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, wrote in an online article published this weekend that Mr Cable is "by a long, long way, the best qualified candidate".
However, one MP said there "wasn't any way" that Mr Cable could take part as he has not held a Treasury brief for four years. A second said: "It has to be Danny. He is not too cosy with Osborne."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments