George Osborne continued with public sector pay cap despite child poverty warnings
Government document stated the policy would 'make it more difficult for low-income families with children to access essential goods'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former chancellor George Osborne stuck with the cap on public sector pay despite child poverty warnings and advice it could have “negative impacts” on family relationships.
A newly released government document reveals that ministers were briefed about the impact on low-income families when limiting pay rises to 1 per cent a year until 2019 – as part of a package of austerity measures.
Civil servants had warned the former chancellor the policy – extended by four years in July 2015 – would “make it more difficult for low-income families with children to access essential goods, and will therefore make it harder for the government to hit the Child Poverty Act targets”.
The GMB union, which obtained the private document through a freedom of information request, said it was “damning” and a “mark of shame” on ministers responsible for introducing the cap “in the full knowledge that would condemn families and children to poverty”.
The documents said, however, that the introduction of what the ex-chancellor dubbed the “National Living Wage” – replacing the minimum wage – would go some way in mitigating the impact of the pay freeze.
It added that as a result of the policy “public sector workers’ take home pay is not likely to keep pace with inflation”.
An estimated 2.4 million children live in households where at least one individual is employed in the public sector, and the policy is believed to have affected more than a million households.
Current chancellor Philip Hammond is preparing to deliver the Budget on Monday afternoon and is under pressure to increase public spending after Theresa May announced an end to the era of austerity in her party conference speech.
Responding to the release of the Treasury document from 2015, Mr Osborne, now editor of the Evening Standard, told the BBC: “We know from the financial crisis that low-income families suffer most when countries lose control of their public spending.
“The Treasury advice was clear that introducing the [National] Living Wage would help protect the low-paid from necessary savings in public spending.”
“Official data on wages over the last couple of years shows clearly that the protection worked, and the wages of the lowest paid have risen fastest.”
GMB’s national secretary Rehana Azam said: “Public sector workers have been forced to leave their homes and use foodbanks, and many of our members are unable to fund basic necessities for their children such as an annual holiday.
“We will fight tooth and nail against all attempts to impose harsh real-terms cuts on our members just because of the region they live in. If Theresa May is serious about ending ‘burning injustices’, she must use this Budget to reverse the fall in living standards that this government has imposed on ordinary working people.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments