Ed Miliband 'would cost Britain jobs' if Labour closed loophole used to exploit cheap foreign labour
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Employers have accused Labour leader Ed Miliband of putting jobs at risk by targeting a “perfectly legal” loophole used to exploit cheap foreign labour.
Ending the ability of unscrupulous bosses to undercut regular staff by paying agency workers lower wages would be among the steps Labour would take if it won the next election, Mr Miliband wrote in The Independent on Sunday.
The TUC claims agency staff are paid up to £135 a week less than permanent staff, despite working in the same place and doing the same job, because of a loophole in the Agency Workers’ Directive.
But Katja Hall, CBI chief policy director, said: “The flexible labour market in this country has saved jobs and kept our economy going during tough times.
“Undermining this flexibility would put the very system which has kept unemployment down at risk. The agency directive was not welcomed by business, and further gold-plating of EU rules can only cost jobs.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments