Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Murdoch's empire `will survive Labour victory'

Patricia Wynn Davies
Friday 24 March 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Rupert Murdoch would not be forced to sell any of his existing newspapers under cross-media ownership rules that could be introduced by an incoming Labour government, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.

The possibility that Mr Murdoch's market dominance, through News International, will survive untouched is certain to be greeted with dismay and anger by Labour's rank and file. However, senior party figures believe that forcing him to sell some of his titles would raise too many practical problems.

News International controls the Times, the Sunday Times, the Sun, Today, the News of the World, BSkyB and Harper-Collins, the publishers, while Mr Murdoch owns 66 per cent of daily newspapers in state capitals in his native Australia.

The group and three others, Associated Newspapers, Mirror Group and United Newspapers, account for 85 per cent of national daily papers.

But well-placed sources within the Labour Party say it would be too problematic to impose a regulatory system that smacked of retrospectivity because it forced the sale of existing titles.

One senior front-bencher said: "There would be practical problems in finding buyers. There would be no ready purchaser, for instance, for Today. It would not be possible for Labour to order Murdoch to divest himself of any of his titles."

It is understood that the stance has the backing of Chris Smith, shadow national heritage secretary, and it is expected to be endorsed by Tony Blair, the Labour leader.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in