Libel case arbitration sets a legal landmark
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LEGAL HISTORY was made last night when a libel action brought by a High Court judge against a newspaper that said he fell asleep during a trial was heard by an arbitrator.
Lord Williams QC, chairman of the Bar Council and a deputy judge, reserved judgment after Mr Justice Popplewell brought the action over an article in the newspaper Today. He is expected to give his decision next week.
It will be the first time libel damages have been set by a judge rather than a jury and could pave the way for further settlements through arbitration, lawyers believe.
Solicitors say that jury awards are little more than a lottery, with the level of damages fluctuating wildly for no apparent reason. Damages set through arbitration should be more consistent.
Today's report, suggesting that Mr Justice Popplewell 'appeared to nod off' during a murder trial, was published seven weeks ago. The newspaper had apologised for the story, accepting that there was 'no truth' in it, and had offered to make amends. The only issue to be resolved at the arbitration hearing, which was in chambers, is the level of damages. The decision is binding; Today cannot appeal.
The action might set a precedent leading to wider use of arbitration schemes when the defendant admits libel. Last summer, a committee chaired by Lord Justice Neill proposed that a formal arbitration procedure should be established and financed by the media.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments