Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Baby P spot-checks' raise council fears

Inspections of children's services suggest failings are widespread

Michael Savage,Richard Garner
Saturday 18 July 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Surprise spot-checks of children's services introduced in the wake of the Baby P scandal have raised "serious concerns" in two thirds of the authorities inspected.

The initial findings by the watchdog Ofsted, which have not yet been published, disclose that "serious concerns" have been found in six out of nine councils spot-checked so far, The Independent understands. None of the councils has been named. "As the letters to authorities have not yet been published we cannot give any further information at this point," a spokesman for Ofsted said.

It raises concerns that flaws in the provision of children's services are more widespread than first feared. A source familiar with the inspections said the results would make uncomfortable reading for those involved. But the findings have provoked a backlash against Ofsted among social workers, many of whom believe the organisation is using alarmist language and attempting to "cover its own back" after the Baby P scandal. Others have accused it of lacking the skills to inspect children's services.

Several councils are said to be challenging the findings, arguing that the "serious concerns" refer to failing to meet some bureaucratic deadlines, rather than failing to keep children safe under their watch. Marion Davis, director of children's services for Warwickshire County Council, said that the term was being applied indiscriminately. "Many of those 'serious concerns' have been about process, such as what is recorded on computers, and not things that impact directly on children's well being," she said. "Ofsted must find a way of distinguishing between the two."

A spokeswoman for the Local Government Association accused Ofsted of making "sweeping judgements from afar" while failing to help councils improve services.

Ofsted has agreed to tone down the language it uses in describing the failings it found during the "no notice spot checks" when it publishes the reports. "We have listened to the concerns about how we describe what we find on the unannounced inspections and, as a result, where we find that practice or systems do not minimise immediate risk for young people, we will highlight areas for priority action," a spokeswoman said. "Ultimately we will do all in our power to ensure that children are getting the level of protection they deserve."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in