Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Royal Opera row over US sponsor plan to sell name for pounds 10m

David Lister
Friday 06 August 1999 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE ROYAL Opera House is planning to allow an American donor to have his name emblazoned on the front of the building in return for a pounds 10m gift.

If the deal goes ahead it will be the first time that one of Britain's four big national arts companies - the Royal Opera House, RSC, National Theatre and English National Opera - has an individual's name on the outside of its building.

The unprecedented nature of the idea is sure to throw the already troubled institution back into controversy. Devised by the ROH's new American chief executive, Michael Kaiser, the plan would allow the donor's name to precede that of the Floral Hall, which is the public foyer and showpiece of the ROH development.

The move was attacked yesterday by the classical music promoter Raymond Gubbay, who has mounted a co- production with the Royal Opera House in the past. "This sounds like a rather tacky American idea," he said. "It's not very nice to see a state- run company doing this. Great national institutions must have their own integrity. I wouldn't want to see a `Jeffrey Archer Victoria and Albert Museum' or a `Richard Branson Royal Albert Hall'.

"If you were to tell me that by doing this the Royal Opera House would bring seat prices down to pounds 20 top price then I might have to say it's OK, but somehow I suspect this will not happen."

The restored 19th-century iron and glass Floral Hall is next to the ROH entrance, and visible to audiences and passers-by in Covent Garden. The sponsor's name would get pride of place on the new building, which will be the main entrance during the day.

Just under pounds 79m of National Lottery money went towards the ROH redevelopment. The opera house also receives a grant from the Arts Council of pounds 16m a year, which will rise to pounds 20m by April 2000.

Mr Gubbay said yesterday: "If there has to be a name on the outside of the building then perhaps it should be `The People's Lottery Floral Hall'."

Mr Kaiser is understood to have had to convince the ROH chairman, Sir Colin Southgate, who was unhappy with the idea and feared it would alarm the arts community. Mr Kaiser seems to have won the battle.

A spokeswoman said yesterday there was no rift between Mr Kaiser and Sir Colin. She said the ROH was negotiating with a number of American donors and charitable trusts, but no commercial sponsors. She said other parts of the building, including the ballet studio that looked out over the Covent garden piazza, could yet have names attached to them.

This latest controversy at the opera house follows a decision by its management to engage a commercial promoter to stage a season by The Royal Ballet in the lottery-funded House, meaning that hundreds of thousands of pounds from ticket sales are likely to go to the promoter. Geoffrey O'Connell, a consultant who helps to monitor lottery money spending, said : "It's outrageous. The lottery was not set up to fund venture capitalism. It was meant to go to good causes."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in