Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

People: Terry Marsh acquitted of student grant fraud

Wednesday 24 September 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Terry Marsh, the former champion boxer, emerged triumphant from a criminal trial for the second time yesterday and promptly invited the jury out for a celebratory drink.

Mr Marsh, 39, was acquitted at Southwark Crown Court of making a fraudulent application for a university grant. The jury took just 15 minutes to clear him of furnishing false information to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.

Mr Marsh, who stood down as a Liberal Democrat candidate because of the charges, said that he intended to report the council to the local government ombudsman. "There could be a civil action as regards a breach of confidentiality," he said.

In 1990, Mr Marsh was cleared of attempting to murder his former promoter, Frank Warren. He began studying for his first degree while in prison on remand.

At this week's trial, the prosecution argued that Mr Marsh deliberately omitted from his application form the fact that he had received a grant for the earlier degree from Essex Council. But he told the jury that he had believed that he was entitled to the second grant of pounds 9,428. When he realised his mistake, he contacted the authority to point it out and asked to take a Higher National Diploma instead.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in